↓ Skip to main content

Reemergence of translocation t(11;19)(q23;p13.1) in the absence of clinically overt leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Reemergence of translocation t(11;19)(q23;p13.1) in the absence of clinically overt leukemia
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12185-017-2289-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suguru Uemura, Akihiro Tamura, Atsuro Saito, Daiichiro Hasegawa, Nanako Nino, Takehito Yokoi, Teppei Tahara, Aiko Kozaki, Kenji Kishimoto, Toshiaki Ishida, Keiichiro Kawasaki, Takeshi Mori, Noriyuki Nishimura, Minenori Ishimae, Mariko Eguchi, Yoshiyuki Kosaka

Abstract

We report the case of a 10-year-old female with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) FAB M0 carrying a novel t(11;19)(q23;p13.1) MLL-ELL variant, in which intron 8 of MLL is fused to exon 6 of ELL. Complete remission, judged by morphology and cytogenetic analysis, was achieved after the conventional chemotherapy. Eight months after completion of therapy, the level of WT-1 in peripheral blood and the number of cells with the MLL-ELL fusion transcript resurged. However, the patient remained overtly healthy and the morphology in the bone-marrow smear was innocuous, with no sign of relapse or secondary leukemia. Without any evidence of relapse, the patient has been closely observed without any therapeutic intervention. For approximately 2 years after the completion of therapy, despite clonal proliferation of pre-leukemic cells with an MLL-ELL fusion gene, she has maintained complete remission. In this case, the rare variant form of MLL-ELL fusion that has been identified may be related to diminished leukemogenic capacity, resulting in the persistence of pre-leukemic status; an additional genetic abnormality may thus be necessary for full transformation of pre-leukemic cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,431,953
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#1,103
of 1,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,848
of 314,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.