↓ Skip to main content

Limits of market-based strategies for slowing global warming: The case of tradeable permits

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, May 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Limits of market-based strategies for slowing global warming: The case of tradeable permits
Published in
Policy Sciences, May 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00138060
Authors

David G. Victor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 24%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#249
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,016
of 17,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.