| Title |
Comparative analysis of ceramic-carbonate nanocomposite fuel cells using composite GDC/NLC electrolyte with different perovskite structured cathode materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11705-017-1642-2 |
| Authors |
Muhammad I. Asghar, Sakari Lepikko, Janne Patakangas, Janne Halme, Peter D. Lund |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 9 | 36% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 16% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,215,480
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering
#20
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,271
of 317,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them