↓ Skip to main content

MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
MRI evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis: is a rapid visual assessment as good as area measurement?
Published in
European Spine Journal, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3248-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greger Lønne, Bent Ødegård, Lars Gunnar Johnsen, Tore K. Solberg, Kjell Arne Kvistad, Øystein P. Nygaard

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is commonly assessed on MRI by measuring dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA). A new method, morphological grading A-D, has recently been introduced as an alternative method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 6 19%
Other 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,775,080
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,910
of 4,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,773
of 221,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#30
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.