| Title |
Should magnesium be given to every migraineur? No
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neural Transmission, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00702-012-0791-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arpad Pardutz, Laszlo Vecsei |
| Abstract |
Migraine is one of the most common neurological disorders that affects young people, causing a considerable degree of disability in the active population, with an enormous consequent socio-economic impact. Despite intensive research, the pathomechanism of migraine is not completely understood and its fully effective therapy remains to be achieved. A number of experimental studies have implicated the importance of magnesium ion in the pathophysiology of this condition. Magnesium has been also administered for both prophylactic and acute therapy in migraine, but the question of its efficacy has not been studied adequately. The data available suggest that magnesium has a potential role in the prophylaxis, but the results in acute therapy are far less convincing. With a good side effect profile, magnesium is a relatively safe drug with a possible beneficial effect in the prophylaxis of migraine headache, and it may have its niche in the treatment of migraine patients. However, the current medical evidence that has accumulated and the fact that there are far more effective treatment possibilities clearly indicate that this drug is definitely not to be used by every migraineur. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,306,796
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#39
of 1,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,385
of 159,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.