Title |
The influence of native macroalgal canopies on the distribution and abundance of the non-native kelp Undaria pinnatifida in natural reef habitats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Marine Biology, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00227-017-3183-0 |
Authors |
Rebecca De Leij, Graham Epstein, Matthew P. Brown, Dan A. Smale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 44% |
United States | 5 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
Scientists | 13 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 42% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,323,368
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#145
of 3,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,906
of 329,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.