↓ Skip to main content

Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update

Overview of attention for article published in Hepatology International, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 592)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1637 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
626 Mendeley
Title
Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update
Published in
Hepatology International, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masao Omata, Ann-Lii Cheng, Norihiro Kokudo, Masatoshi Kudo, Jeong Min Lee, Jidong Jia, Ryosuke Tateishi, Kwang-Hyub Han, Yoghesh K. Chawla, Shuichiro Shiina, Wasim Jafri, Diana Alcantara Payawal, Takamasa Ohki, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Pei-Jer Chen, Cosmas Rinaldi A. Lesmana, Laurentius A. Lesmana, Rino A. Gani, Shuntaro Obi, A. Kadir Dokmeci, Shiv Kumar Sarin

Abstract

There is great geographical variation in the distribution of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with the majority of all cases worldwide found in the Asia-Pacific region, where HCC is one of the leading public health problems. Since the "Toward Revision of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) HCC Guidelines" meeting held at the 25th annual conference of the APASL in Tokyo, the newest guidelines for the treatment of HCC published by the APASL has been discussed. This latest guidelines recommend evidence-based management of HCC and are considered suitable for universal use in the Asia-Pacific region, which has a diversity of medical environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 626 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 626 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 10%
Student > Bachelor 55 9%
Other 52 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 7%
Student > Master 43 7%
Other 131 21%
Unknown 234 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 231 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 5%
Computer Science 12 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Other 71 11%
Unknown 261 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#923,137
of 24,611,662 outputs
Outputs from Hepatology International
#12
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,339
of 321,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hepatology International
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,611,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them