↓ Skip to main content

Strength of the casings of the deep-water neutrino telescopes made from the S94-3 glass

Overview of attention for article published in Glass and Ceramics, February 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 126)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Strength of the casings of the deep-water neutrino telescopes made from the S94-3 glass
Published in
Glass and Ceramics, February 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00682495
Authors

G. M. Okhrimenko, Yu. N. Evplov, L. B. Bezrukov, A. A. Doroshenko, A. I. Panfilov, E. F. Solinov, M. I. Dol'nikov, P. I. Litvinov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2010.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Glass and Ceramics
#25
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,889
of 67,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glass and Ceramics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them