↓ Skip to main content

Calculation of microbial growth efficiency from15N immobilization

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, October 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Calculation of microbial growth efficiency from15N immobilization
Published in
Biogeochemistry, October 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02182998
Authors

D. S. Schimel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 45%
Environmental Science 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,746,961
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#250
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,518
of 13,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them