| Title |
Vegetation redistribution: A possible biosphere source of CO2 during climatic change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, October 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01105028 |
| Authors |
Ronald P. Neilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 19 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#161
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,539
of 21,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.