You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual Floral Induction Requirements in Phleum alpinum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, December 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088083 |
| Authors |
O. M. HEIDE |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Serbia | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 18% |
| Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#2,209
of 3,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,977
of 59,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them