↓ Skip to main content

Why are adaptations for long-range seed dispersal rare in desert plants?

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Why are adaptations for long-range seed dispersal rare in desert plants?
Published in
Oecologia, October 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00344663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Fllner, Avi Shmida

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Israel 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 181 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Researcher 38 19%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 61%
Environmental Science 34 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 30 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,683
of 4,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,923
of 7,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.