↓ Skip to main content

p62/SQSTM1 at the interface of aging, autophagy, and disease

Overview of attention for article published in GeroScience, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
p62/SQSTM1 at the interface of aging, autophagy, and disease
Published in
GeroScience, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11357-014-9626-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Bitto, Chad A. Lerner, Timothy Nacarelli, Elizabeth Crowe, Claudio Torres, Christian Sell

Abstract

Advanced age is characterized by increased incidence of many chronic, noninfectious diseases that impair the quality of living of the elderly and pose a major burden on the healthcare systems of developed countries. These diseases are characterized by impaired or altered function at the tissue and cellular level, which is a hallmark of the aging process. Age-related impairments are likely due to loss of homeostasis at the cellular level, which leads to the accumulation of dysfunctional organelles and damaged macromolecules, such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Intriguingly, aging and age-related diseases can be delayed by modulating nutrient signaling pathways converging on the target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase, either by genetic or dietary intervention. TOR signaling influences aging through several potential mechanisms, such as autophagy, a degradation pathway that clears the dysfunctional organelles and damaged macromolecules that accumulate with aging. Autophagy substrates are targeted for degradation by associating with p62/SQSTM1, a multidomain protein that interacts with the autophagy machinery. p62/SQSTM1 is involved in several cellular processes, and its loss has been linked to accelerated aging and to age-related pathologies. In this review, we describe p62/SQSTM1, its role in autophagy and in signaling pathways, and its emerging role in aging and age-associated pathologies. Finally, we propose p62/SQSTM1 as a novel target for aging studies and age-extending interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 148 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from GeroScience
#1,337
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,046
of 239,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeroScience
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.