| Title |
Archaeological potato tuber remains from the casma valley of peru
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 1982
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02858715 |
| Authors |
Donald Ugent, Shelia Pozorski, Thomas Pozorski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 24% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,799,012
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#199
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,839
of 7,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them