| Title |
The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4867-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Muscedere, Braden Waters, Aditya Varambally, Sean M. Bagshaw, J. Gordon Boyd, David Maslove, Stephanie Sibley, Kenneth Rockwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 285 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 62 | 22% |
| United States | 33 | 12% |
| Canada | 19 | 7% |
| Spain | 15 | 5% |
| Australia | 13 | 5% |
| Denmark | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 22% |
| Scientists | 54 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 592 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 10% |
| Other | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 9% |
| Other | 147 | 25% |
| Unknown | 154 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 266 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 60 | 10% |
| Unknown | 182 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#214,014
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#156
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,465
of 329,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.