↓ Skip to main content

Autism Spectrum Disorder: Defining Dimensions and Subgroups

Overview of attention for article published in Current Developmental Disorders Reports, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 182)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
Title
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Defining Dimensions and Subgroups
Published in
Current Developmental Disorders Reports, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40474-013-0003-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Opal Ousley, Tracy Cermak

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a behaviorally defined neurodevelopmental disorder associated with the presence of social-communication deficits and restricted and repetitive behaviors. In the latest conceptualization of ASD, these two behavioral dimensions represent the core defining features of ASD, whereas associated dimensions, such as intellectual and language ability, provide a means for describing the ASD heterogeneity. In addition, the characterization of ASD subgroups, defined by the presence of known medical, genetic, or other psychiatric disorders, furthers our understanding of ASD heterogeneity. This paper reviews the history of autism, describes its core defining features, and provides an overview of the clinically and etiologically relevant subgroups that add to the complexity of this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 423 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 15%
Student > Master 49 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 10%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 167 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 11%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Neuroscience 23 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 176 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,572,139
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Developmental Disorders Reports
#25
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,156
of 326,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Developmental Disorders Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them