↓ Skip to main content

From intention to STI prevention: An online questionnaire on barriers and facilitators for discussing sexual risk behaviour among HIV nurses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From intention to STI prevention: An online questionnaire on barriers and facilitators for discussing sexual risk behaviour among HIV nurses
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, August 2017
DOI 10.1111/jan.13372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne de Munnik, Sigrid C.J.M. Vervoort, Heidi S.M. Ammerlaan, Gerjo Kok, Chantal den Daas

Abstract

We aimed to elucidate facilitators and barriers that HIV nurses experience in discussing sexual risk behaviour with HIV- positive patients men who have sex with men, using variables from a previous qualitative study and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. HIV-positive men who have sex with men are frequently diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections, which can be reduced if HIV nurses discuss sexual risk behaviour. An online questionnaire was disseminated April 2015 among all HIV nurses in the Netherlands. We assessed variables, such as attitudes, shame, ability, knowledge and time concerns. A regression analysis was conducted with 'intention to discuss sexual risk behaviour' as an outcome variable. The questionnaire was completed by 60 of 79 HIV nurses. Overall, participants reported high intentions to discuss sexual risk behaviour and 38% of the variance was explained by attitude, sexual preference, knowing ways to introduce the topic and experiencing enough time or viewing it as a priority. In addition, high intenders significantly differed from low intenders in 'experienced shame', 'relation with patients', 'non-verbal communication', 'subjective norm' and 'knowledge'. Improving sexual health in HIV care translates into improving opportunities and the facilitating factors in initiating the discussion of sexual risk behaviour rather than removing barriers HIV nurses experience. Interventions should mainly focus on improving the HIV nurses' perceived ability to initiate the topic of sexual risk behaviour and to utilize the jargon and terminology that is commonly used among men who have sex with men. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 23 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Psychology 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Design 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,960,533
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#1,356
of 5,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,314
of 321,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#51
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.