You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trousseau sign in hypocalcemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2011
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.100613 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Habib U Rehman, Shane Wunder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 21% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 54% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,286,286
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4,748
of 8,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,379
of 109,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#49
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.