| Title |
Pharmacists’ perceptions of their emerging general practice roles in UK primary care: a qualitative interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x691733 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Butterworth, Anna Sansom, Laura Sims, Mark Healey, Ellie Kingsland, John Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 46 | 51% |
| Australia | 6 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 62% |
| Scientists | 15 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 31 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#614,453
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#258
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,650
of 328,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.