↓ Skip to main content

Dysphagia in Hospitalized Older Patients: Associated Factors and Nutritional Interventions

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Dysphagia in Hospitalized Older Patients: Associated Factors and Nutritional Interventions
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12603-017-0928-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doris Eglseer, R.J.G. Halfens, J.M.G.A. Schols, C. Lohrmann

Abstract

To (1) assess the association between dysphagia and malnutrition as well as other related factors and (2) investigate the nutritional interventions that are initiated in dysphagic older patients. Cross-sectional, multi-center point prevalence measurement. 53 Austrian hospitals. 3174 hospitalized patients, 65 years or older. A standardized and tested questionnaire was used for the data collection, which was based on both inspections of the patients and information documented in the patient chart. Medical diagnoses were assessed by referring to the International Classification of Diseases. Dysphagia was measured by asking the patient a dichotomous question. Several other data points were collected including: gender, age, number of diseases, malnutrition, care dependency scale (CDS) score and dependency during activities of daily living (ADL). To investigate the associations between dysphagia and malnutrition and other associated factors, cross tabulation, chi-squared test, t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used. The prevalence of dysphagia among these patients was 7.6%. Dysphagia and malnutrition were significantly associated (< 0.001). Patients with dysphagia had statistically significant lower BMI values (p = 0.01), more medical diagnoses (p = 0.003) and were more care dependent (p < 0.001) than patients who did not suffer from dysphagia. The frequency of underlying respiratory diseases, dementia, nervous system disorders and cerebrovascular accidents also differed significantly between dysphagic and non-dysphagic patients. The following nutritional interventions were most frequently initiated in patients with dysphagia: provision of texture-modified food/fluid (32.2%), referral to a dietitian (31.4%), provision of an energy- and/or protein-enriched diet (27.3%), monitoring of nutritional intake (21.5%), enteral nutrition (19.4%) and provision of energy-enriched snacks (15.7%). 24% of patients received no nutritional interventions. This study demonstrates that a very strong association exists between dysphagia and malnutrition as well as high levels of care dependency and dependency in activities of daily living. Nearly one-quarter of the patients did not receive any nutritional intervention. Therefore, a potential for the improvement of nutritional therapy in older dysphagic hospitalized patients still exists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 54 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 55 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,490,133
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#721
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,038
of 451,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#20
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.