| Title |
A short history of MADS-box genes in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1006332105728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Günter Theissen, Annette Becker, Alexandra Di Rosa, Akira Kanno, Jan T. Kim, Thomas Münster, Kai-Uwe Winter, Heinz Saedler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 346 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 25% |
| Researcher | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Professor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 258 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,220,862
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#119
of 2,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,385
of 112,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.