↓ Skip to main content

Integrating long‐day flowering signals: a LEAFY binding site is essential for proper photoperiodic activation of APETALA1

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Journal, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating long‐day flowering signals: a LEAFY binding site is essential for proper photoperiodic activation of APETALA1
Published in
Plant Journal, July 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04660.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reyes Benlloch, Min Chul Kim, Camille Sayou, Emmanuel Thévenon, Francois Parcy, Ove Nilsson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 24%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,604,748
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Plant Journal
#2,687
of 7,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,087
of 130,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Journal
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.