↓ Skip to main content

Blastocystis exhibits inter- and intra-subtype variation in cysteine protease activity

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Blastocystis exhibits inter- and intra-subtype variation in cysteine protease activity
Published in
Parasitology Research, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00436-008-1203-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haris Mirza, Kevin S. W. Tan

Abstract

Blastocystis is an enteric protistan parasite of zoonotic potential and poorly understood pathogenesis. We have previously reported that Blastocystis cysteine proteases can degrade human secretory IgA and are also responsible for the induction of IL-8 response in colonic epithelial cells in vitro. Differences in virulence between Blastocystis subtypes have been reported recently in both animal models and clinical studies, although cellular mechanisms for these differences are currently unknown. Parasites such as Giardia intestinalis and Entamoeba histolytica have distinct virulent and non-virulent strains which may be attributable to variations in their cysteine proteases. In the present study, variations in cysteine protease activity was observed between avian (subtype 7) and rodent (subtype 4) isolates of Blastocystis with avian isolates exhibiting approximately two times higher peak cysteine protease activity than rodent isolates. Cysteine protease activity and parasite cell size varied over time within cultures of the same isolate. An association between parasite cell size and protease activity was observed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,007,098
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#219
of 3,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,848
of 90,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.