↓ Skip to main content

Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad…

Overview of attention for article published in Europace, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
43 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLAECE).
Published in
Europace, July 2017
DOI 10.1093/europace/eux177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georges H Mairesse, Patrick Moran, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Christian Elsner, Marten Rosenqvist, Jonathan Mant, Amitava Banerjee, Bulent Gorenek, Johannes Brachmann, Niraj Varma, Gustavo Glotz de Lima, Jonathan Kalman, Neree Claes, Trudie Lobban, Deirdre Lane, Gregory Y H Lip, Giuseppe Boriani, Laurent Fauchier, Werner Jung, Irina Savelieva, Benedict Freedman, Shih Ann Chen, Rodrigo Isa, Mintu Turakhia, John Lewis Sapp, Gregory Lip, Bulent Gorenek, Christian Sticherling, Laurent Fauchier, A Goette, Werner Jung, Marc A Vos, Michele Brignole, Christian Elsner, Gheorghe-Andrei Dan, Francisco Marin, Giuseppe Boriani, Deirdre Lane, Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist, Irina Savelieva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 13%
Other 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 59 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 42%
Engineering 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 75 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#881,895
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#113
of 3,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,036
of 325,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#2
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.