Title |
Rectal carcinoids: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3430-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frank D. McDermott, Anna Heeney, Danielle Courtney, Helen Mohan, Des Winter |
Abstract |
Rectal carcinoids are increasing in incidence worldwide. Frequently thought of as a relatively benign condition, there are limited data regarding optimal treatment strategies for both localized and more advanced disease. The aim of this study was to summarize published experiences with rectal carcinoids and to present the most current data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 18% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
Italy | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 18% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 63% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,719,512
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#737
of 6,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,758
of 223,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#20
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.