| Title |
Posterior Tibial Tendon Transfer Improves Function for Foot Drop After Knee Dislocation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3533-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marius Molund, Lars Engebretsen, Kjetil Hvaal, Jan Hellesnes, Elisabeth Ellingsen Husebye |
| Abstract |
Knee dislocation may be associated with an injury to the common peroneal nerve with a subsequent foot drop. Previous studies have demonstrated good functional results after posterior tibial tendon transfer in patients with foot drop. No studies, to our knowledge, have focused exclusively on knee dislocation as the cause of common peroneal nerve injury leading to foot drop. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,984,212
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,179
of 7,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,092
of 249,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#51
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.