↓ Skip to main content

Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11682-014-9297-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Ganguli, Ching-Wen Lee, Tiffany Hughes, Beth E. Snitz, Jennifer Jakubcak, Ranjan Duara, Chung-Chou H. Chang

Abstract

Neuroimaging research is usually conducted in volunteers who meet a priori selection criteria. Selection/volunteer bias is assumed but cannot be assessed. During an ongoing population-based cohort study of 1982 older adults, we asked 1702 active participants about their interest in undergoing a research brain scan. Compared with those not interested, the 915 potentially interested individuals were significantly younger, more likely to be male, better educated, generally healthier, and more likely to be cognitively intact and dementia-free. In 48 of the interested individuals, we conducted a previously reported pilot structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) study modelling mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vs. normal cognition, and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 vs. CDR = 0, as a function of sMRI atrophy ratings. We now compare these 48 individuals (1) with all interested participants, to assess selection bias; (2) with all who had been asked about their interest, to assess volunteer bias; and (3) with the entire study cohort, to assess attrition bias from those who had dropped out before the question was asked. Using these data in propensity score models, we generated weights which we applied to logistic regression models reanalyzing the data from the pilot sMRI study. These weighted models adjusted, in turn, for selection bias, interest/volunteer bias, and attrition bias. They show fewer regions of interest to be associated with MCI/ CDR than were in the original unweighted models. When study participants are drawn from a well-characterized population, they can be compared with non-participants, and the information used to correct study results for potential bias and thus provide more generalizable estimates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Unspecified 6 9%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,063,152
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#87
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,242
of 239,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.