↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenic prion protein is degraded by a manganese oxide mineral found in soils

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Virology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenic prion protein is degraded by a manganese oxide mineral found in soils
Published in
Journal of General Virology, January 2009
DOI 10.1099/vir.0.003251-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Russo, Christopher J. Johnson, Chad J. Johnson, Debbie McKenzie, Judd M. Aiken, Joel A. Pedersen

Abstract

Prions, the aetiological agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, exhibit extreme resistance to degradation. Soil can retain prion infectivity in the environment for years. Reactive soil components may, however, contribute to the inactivation of prions in soil. Members of the birnessite family of manganese oxides (MnO(2)) rank among the strongest natural oxidants in soils. Here, we report the abiotic degradation of pathogenic prion protein (PrP(TSE)) by a synthetic analogue of naturally occurring birnessite minerals. Aqueous MnO(2) suspensions degraded the PrP(TSE) as evidenced by decreased immunoreactivity and diminished ability to seed protein misfolding cyclic amplification reactions. Birnessite-mediated PrP(TSE) degradation increased as a solution's pH decreased, consistent with the pH-dependence of the redox potential of MnO(2). Exposure to 5.6 mg MnO(2) ml(-1) (PrP(TSE) : MnO(2)=1 : 110) decreased PrP(TSE) levels by > or = 4 orders of magnitude. Manganese oxides may contribute to prion degradation in soil environments rich in these minerals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Professor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Environmental Science 7 13%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,937,459
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Virology
#2,219
of 6,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,051
of 168,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Virology
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.