↓ Skip to main content

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the KCNN3 Gene Associate With Preterm Birth

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Sciences, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the KCNN3 Gene Associate With Preterm Birth
Published in
Reproductive Sciences, December 2011
DOI 10.1177/1933719110391277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori J. Day, Kendra L. Schaa, Kelli K. Ryckman, Meg Cooper, John M. Dagle, Chin-To Fong, Hyagriv N. Simhan, David C. Merrill, Mary L. Marazita, Jeffrey C. Murray, Sarah K. England

Abstract

The objectives were to determine whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in KCNN3 (encodes the small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel subfamily N, member 3), associate with preterm birth (PTB). In all, 602 preterm families with at least 1 preterm (<37 weeks gestation) infant were studied: DNA from the infant and one or both parents were genotyped for 16 SNPs in KCNN3. A region of interest within KCNN3 was sequenced in 512 Caucasian non-Hispanic mothers (412 with preterm deliveries;100 who delivered at term). Family-based association testing was used for genotyping analysis; Fisher exact test was used for sequencing analysis. Six SNPs (rs1218585, rs4845396, rs12058931, rs1218568, rs6426985, and rs4845394) were associated with PTB (all Ps < .05). These variations were all located within the intronic region between exons 1 and 2. Maternal sequencing revealed an association of 3 SNPs with spontaneous PTB; rs1218585 (P = .007), rs1218584 (P = .05), and a novel SNP at chromosome1:153099353 (P = .02). Polymorphisms in KCNN3 are associated with PTB and investigation into the functional significance of these allelic changes is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,294,762
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Sciences
#501
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,140
of 243,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Sciences
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.