↓ Skip to main content

Duplications of the critical Rubinstein-Taybi deletion region on chromosome 16p13.3 cause a novel recognisable syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duplications of the critical Rubinstein-Taybi deletion region on chromosome 16p13.3 cause a novel recognisable syndrome
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, October 2009
DOI 10.1136/jmg.2009.070573
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Thienpont, F. Bena, J. Breckpot, N. Philip, B. Menten, H. Van Esch, E. Scalais, J. M. Salamone, C.-T. Fong, J. L. Kussmann, D. K. Grange, J. L. Gorski, F. Zahir, S. L. Yong, M. M. Morris, S. Gimelli, J.-P. Fryns, G. Mortier, J. M. Friedman, L. Villard, A. Bottani, J. R. Vermeesch, S. W. Cheung, K. Devriendt

Abstract

The introduction of molecular karyotyping technologies facilitated the identification of specific genetic disorders associated with imbalances of certain genomic regions. A detailed phenotypic delineation of interstitial 16p13.3 duplications is hampered by the scarcity of such patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,402,843
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#1,345
of 2,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,865
of 93,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.