↓ Skip to main content

Comment: On the need for validation of the Jones et al. temperature trends with respect to urban warming

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, June 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Comment: On the need for validation of the Jones et al. temperature trends with respect to urban warming
Published in
Climatic Change, June 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00139434
Authors

Fred B. Wood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,113,306
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,352
of 6,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#642
of 12,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.