↓ Skip to main content

Climate-Convection Feedbacks: Some Further Issues

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Climate-Convection Feedbacks: Some Further Issues
Published in
Climatic Change, May 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1005323805826
Authors

Alan K. Betts

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 52%
Environmental Science 6 29%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,753,240
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,603
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,632
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.