↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating GCM Output with Impact Models

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating GCM Output with Impact Models
Published in
Climatic Change, May 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1005369006034
Authors

Larry J. Williams, Daigee Shaw, Robert Mendelsohn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,605
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,632
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.