↓ Skip to main content

Global Warming Potentials: 2. Accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Global Warming Potentials: 2. Accuracy
Published in
Climatic Change, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1005537014987
Authors

Steven J. Smith, T. M. L. Wigley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,843
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,778
of 41,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.