↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of Drought in Western Sicily during the Period 1565–1915 from Liturgical Offices

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of Drought in Western Sicily during the Period 1565–1915 from Liturgical Offices
Published in
Climatic Change, April 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1010746612289
Authors

E. Piervitali, M. Colacino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 48%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 32%
Environmental Science 6 19%
Arts and Humanities 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,605
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,919
of 43,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.