| Title |
Modeling Global Climate–Vegetation Interactions in a Doubled CO2 World
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1010609620103 |
| Authors |
Jon C. Bergengren, Starley L. Thompson, David Pollard, Robert M. DeConto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 12% |
| Professor | 13 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,605
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,335
of 40,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.