| Title |
Tree Mortality in Gap Models: Application to Climate Change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1012539409854 |
| Authors |
Robert E. Keane, Mike Austin, Christopher Field, Andreas Huth, Manfred J. Lexer, Debra Peters, Allen Solomon, Peter Wyckoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 6% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 201 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 95 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,603
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,932
of 132,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.