| Title |
Can Trees Buy Time? An Assessment of the Role of Vegetation Sinks as Part of the Global Carbon Cycle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, May 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1023447504860 |
| Authors |
Miko U. F. Kirschbaum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 52 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Energy | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,605
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,429
of 54,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.