| Title |
Vulnerability of the Asian Typical Steppe to Grazing and Climate Change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:clim.0000018513.60904.fe |
| Authors |
Lindsey Christensen, Michael B. Coughenour, James E. Ellis, Zuo Zhong Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,109,257
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,307
of 6,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,904
of 65,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.