↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Major Pools and Fluxes of Carbon in Indian Forests

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of Major Pools and Fluxes of Carbon in Indian Forests
Published in
Climatic Change, June 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:clim.0000025740.50082.e7
Authors

Abha Chhabra, V. K. Dadhwal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 33%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 13%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,841
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,106
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.