| Title |
‘New Estimates of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in China’S Forests: Effects of Age–Class and Method On Inventory-Based Carbon Estimation’
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5 |
| Authors |
Yude Pan, Tianxiang Luo, Richard Birdsey, John Hom, Jerry Melillo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Energy | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,822,333
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,618
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,015
of 141,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.