↓ Skip to main content

Verification of Carbon Sink Assessment: Can We Exclude Natural Sinks?

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Verification of Carbon Sink Assessment: Can We Exclude Natural Sinks?
Published in
Climatic Change, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10584-004-2801-2
Authors

Georgii Alexandrov, Yoshiki Yamagata

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 14%
Engineering 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,338
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,700
of 141,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#18
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.