↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity, photosynthetic mode, and ecosystem services differ between native and novel ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Biodiversity, photosynthetic mode, and ecosystem services differ between native and novel ecosystems
Published in
Oecologia, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2911-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne M. Martin, H. Wayne Polley, Pedram P. Daneshgar, Mary A. Harris, Brian J. Wilsey

Abstract

Human activities have caused non-native plant species with novel ecological interactions to persist on landscapes, and it remains controversial whether these species alter multiple aspects of communities and ecosystems. We tested whether native and exotic grasslands differ in species diversity, ecosystem services, and an important aspect of functional diversity (C3:C4 proportions) by sampling 42 sites along a latitudinal gradient and conducting a controlled experiment. Exotic-dominated grasslands had drastically lower plant diversity and slightly higher tissue N concentrations and forage quality compared to native-dominated sites. Exotic sites were strongly dominated by C4 species at southern and C3 species at northern latitudes with a sharp transition at 36-38°, whereas native sites contained C3:C4 mixtures. Large differences in C3:C4 proportions and temporal niche partitioning were found between native and exotic mixtures in the experiment, implying that differences in C3:C4 proportions along the latitudinal gradient are caused partially by species themselves. Our results indicate that the replacement of native- by exotic-dominated grasslands has created a management tradeoff (high diversity versus high levels of certain ecosystem services) and that models of global change impacts and C3/C4 distribution should consider effects of exotic species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Chile 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 111 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 52%
Environmental Science 38 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 13 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,725,370
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#728
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,692
of 221,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.