| Title |
AgClimate: a case study in participatory decision support system development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-007-9323-7 |
| Authors |
N. E. Breuer, V. E. Cabrera, K. T. Ingram, K. Broad, P. E. Hildebrand |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,338
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,614
of 72,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.