↓ Skip to main content

Learning about ozone depletion

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Learning about ozone depletion
Published in
Climatic Change, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9400-6
Authors

Paul J. Crutzen, Michael Oppenheimer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Croatia 1 2%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 59 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,338
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,248
of 80,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.