| Title |
Impact of climate change and irrigation technology advancement on agricultural water use in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-010-9860-3 |
| Authors |
Pute Wu, Jiming Jin, Xining Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 18% |
| Engineering | 7 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,338
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,724
of 96,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#30
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.