↓ Skip to main content

Psychohistory revisited: fundamental issues in forecasting climate futures

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Psychohistory revisited: fundamental issues in forecasting climate futures
Published in
Climatic Change, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9995-2
Authors

Danny Cullenward, Lee Schipper, Anant Sudarshan, Richard B. Howarth

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Germany 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 38 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 12%
Mathematics 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Other 15 35%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,578,759
of 24,882,360 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,551
of 5,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,700
of 192,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#35
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,882,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.