↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0395-z
Authors

A. L. Kay, R. G. Jones

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 30%
Environmental Science 15 21%
Engineering 13 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,338
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,850
of 244,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#42
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.