| Title |
Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. K. Filippiadis, C. Binkert, O. Pellerin, R. T. Hoffmann, A. Krajina, P. L. Pereira |
| Abstract |
Interventional radiology provides a wide variety of vascular, nonvascular, musculoskeletal, and oncologic minimally invasive techniques aimed at therapy or palliation of a broad spectrum of pathologic conditions. Outcome data for these techniques are globally evaluated by hospitals, insurance companies, and government agencies targeting in a high-quality health care policy, including reimbursement strategies. To analyze effectively the outcome of a technique, accurate reporting of complications is necessary. Throughout the literature, numerous classification systems for complications grading and classification have been reported. Until now, there has been no method for uniform reporting of complications both in terms of definition and grading. The purpose of this CIRSE guideline is to provide a classification system of complications based on combining outcome and severity of sequelae. The ultimate challenge will be the adoption of this system by practitioners in different countries and health economies within the European Union and beyond. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 65 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,741,479
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#39
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,965
of 321,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.