You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DETermination of the role of OXygen in suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Heart Journal, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Hofmann, Stefan K. James, Leif Svensson, Nils Witt, Mats Frick, Bertil Lindahl, Ollie Östlund, Ulf Ekelund, David Erlinge, Johan Herlitz, Tomas Jernberg |
| Abstract |
The use of supplemental oxygen in the setting of suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is recommended in international treatment guidelines and established in prehospital and hospital clinical routine throughout the world. However, to date there is no conclusive evidence from adequately designed and powered trials supporting this practice. Existing data are conflicting and fail to clarify the role of supplemental oxygen in AMI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 53% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 35% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,361,040
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from American Heart Journal
#208
of 5,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,613
of 321,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Heart Journal
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.